Order Subscription, 31st to 38th issue
Issues 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 & 38
8 × 20 pages and sometimes more
21 × 29,7 cm, CMYK
Design: Syndicat
2021-2022
Order Subscription, 31st to 38th issue
Issues 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 & 38
8 × 20 pages and sometimes more
21 × 29,7 cm, CMYK
Design: Syndicat
2021-2022
Jonathan Monk, «Exhibit Model Four», 2019 Kindl, Berlin. Photographie: Jens Ziehe. Affiche A1 imprimée en CMJN sur papier dos bleu, exemplaire signé par l’artiste (1/25)
n°18 — A studio visit: Ines Cox. Authors: Manon Bruet and Julia Andréone
Author: Manon Bruet
Photos: Julia Andréone
20 pages, 21 × 29,7 cm, CMYK+1PMS
17 December 2019
ISBN: 979-10-95991-15-1
ISSN: 2558-2062
Author: Manon Bruet
Photos: Julia Andréone
20 pages, 21 × 29,7 cm, CMYK+1PMS
17 December 2019
ISBN: 979-10-95991-15-1
ISSN: 2558-2062
Three women walk into a bar. The first lives in a large apartment in Anvers, Belgium. The second is an independent Graphic Designer who founded her own studio. The third is an avatar—you might even know her—with a certain interest in creative processes, their interfaces, and their vocabularies. Together, they eat some pistachio nuts, order vodka, and are not at all sure about getting up the next day to teach at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts. But together, more than anything else, they form the troubling multiple personality of Ines Cox, a Belgian Graphic Designer who met Julia Andréone and Manon Bruet in her studio in June 2019. An opportunity to develop a narrative driven by three voices and to trace the outline of a path, a practice, and a figure.
n°23 — Jan Tschichold: The Master approving of his own work. Author: Žiga Testen
Author: Žiga Testen
24 pages, 21 × 29,7 cm, CMYK
9 September 2020
ISBN: 979-10-95991-17-5
ISSN: 2558-2062
Author: Žiga Testen
24 pages, 21 × 29,7 cm, CMYK
9 September 2020
ISBN: 979-10-95991-17-5
ISSN: 2558-2062
Design history as an independent discipline and field of study appears to be in trouble. Design historians complain about its diminishing influence within universities due to the ongoing instrumentalisation of higher education. The Eurocentric canon built upon values and methods adopted from art and architecture history has been contested by decolonial theories. And finally, it appears that the trust in the institution of ‘history’ itself and its meta-narratives has eroded.
A discipline that was once considered to provide reflection on what came before and guidance on what could come to be—under the auspice of a grand narrative of continuous progress—has been replaced by modest narratives, social anthropologies, and claims of the ‘end of history’.
In this article, I rummage through the ruins of design history and try to unpack what it was that we once considered design history and our design history canon, how we wrote about it and to what end. In particular, I focus on this one image: a portrait photograph of a well-known historical figure, the designer and typographer Jan Tschichold. How is it used? And what stories do we tell about it?